• $10,000,000.00
    Leg Amputation
  • $3,000,000.00
    Traumatic Injury
  • $2,250,000.00
    Auto Accident
View More Results

Free Consultation 24/7
Nights & Weekends

Settlements & Verdicts

Get the compensation
you deserve

View more results
  • $10,000,000.00
    Leg Amputation
  • $5,000,000.00
    Truck Accident
  • $3,000,000.00
    Traumatic Injury

New Jersey Supreme Court Denies Challenge of Roving Wiretaps

The NJ Supreme Court recently handed down a decision that potentially expands the ability of state law enforcement to use roving wiretaps in criminal cases.

The important decision was issued in the case of Hector Feliciano, a convicted drug dealer who had been accused of trafficking heroin throughout Camden, New Jersey. Camden County prosecutors had argued that Feliciano was the leader of a heroin distribution network and secured a conviction in Camden County Superior Court. This prompted Feliciano’s criminal defense attorneys to challenge the conviction on the basis that the wiretaps used to secure crucial evidence against their client were unconstitutional.

In 2007, the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office and the Philadelphia/Camden High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Task Force opened an investigation into the suspect. As part of the investigation, police applied for a number of wiretap orders, including eight “roving” wiretaps.

A roving wiretap allows law enforcement to follow a particular suspect, as opposed to tracking a specific phone. The need for roving wiretaps has become greater in recent years as police have struggled to keep up with drug dealers who avoid surveillance by discarding their phones at high rates. The NJ Supreme Court noted the difficulties faced by police, stating that a suspect who switches telephones “can effectively avoid being intercepted.”

The New Jersey Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, has now affirmed the constitutionality of the roving wiretaps. In the drug crime case against Feliciano, the NJ Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower superior court, as well as the NJ Appellate Division court.

For further information about this case, see the NJ.com article, “‘Roving’ Wiretaps OK by N.J. Supreme Court.”

 

If you or a loved one faces criminal charges for heroin possession, heroin distribution or any other drug offense in New Jersey or Pennsylvania, you need to talk to a qualified criminal defense attorney immediately. The experienced criminal defense lawyers at Garber Law will help you fight your criminal charges. Contact us now to schedule a free consultation about your case.

How Can We Help You?

Request a free consultation

Voorhees

The Greens of Laurel Oak
1200 Laurel Oak Road, Suite 104
Voorhees, NJ 08043

Phone: 856-281-1480

Fax: 856-435-7676

Map and Directions

Philadelphia

Aramark Building
1101 Market Street, Suite 2820
Philadelphia, PA 19107

Phone: 866-556-2962

Map and Directions

Areas We Serve

We serve clients in South Jersey and throughout the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Metro Area, including Burlington County, Camden County, Gloucester County, Atlantic County and Salem County NJ.